Some think that what happened in Syria can't be manipulated. Many politicians and concerned people think that the event is out of control of the international community represented by Washington, London, Paris, Russia and China and all great countries. However; the all participated in crimes committed by Bashar al-Assad's force, through clear support by Iran and Hezbollah, by dragging thousands of Hezbollah and Revolutionary Guard elements to participate in shedding the blood of the Syrian People savagely as televised by international and Arabic screens. The silence of the international community came as a result of adhering to protect the  Hebraic entity (Israel) and for short and long terms aims:
First: the Western countries together desire to make the Syrian regime to corrode from the inside little by little for weakening the capabilities of Syrian Army which is considered as organized and excellently armed. For this reason, the West needs to exhaust the Syrian Army, fragmenting it even if the Syrian people's crisis continues for years. This will assist latter on in putting hand on Syria even after setting up the revolution. They know that Bashar al-Asad is certainly will fall. However, they don’t want him to fall quickly in order to maintain Israeli security and for facilitating for them in the future to deal with the new leadership which will receive an exhausted country shackled by debts, destroyed and supposed to be busy by itself instead of being busy by the fateful problems of the country and the nation. Part of the Syrian land is still under occupation, occupied by Israel. The revolutionaries in Syria will not accept for Syria to be under the control of Israel. Therefore, there is no room for the Syria Revolution to succeed and in such speed. The Syria blood shedding should be stopped and all talks and decisions issued by Security Council are maneuvers have already been agreed to with Russia and China. I think that many politicians know what had been done by former USSR during the crisis and the war between the two Koreas in fifties of the last century, when the Soviet Envoy in UN promised the Korean envoy to use veto against an international resolution was to be issued after two days then, but when the time of voting on the resolution, the Soviet envoy went to (toilet) few minutes before the voting. The Council voted and he came afterwards when the Council issued the decision. This is the political game or the dirty game, no permanent   friendship nor hostility.
-followed-